Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Normal Kids Being Labeled Mentally Ill
Christian-Forum.net > Current Events > Current Events
flyingsquirrel
I know this is true because I used to work in the pharm industry...phsychotropic drugs, such as anti-depressants, are perscribed more often than any other medication...its so bad, anti-depressents (& birth control drugs) are in in the animal food chain having dire affects on the developement of growing animals and fish....and the drug companies that sell this, are no different in atitude and approach to the sell of drugs than then any illegal drug lord


http://www.newstarget.com/020092.html
Despite years of public outcry, based on recommendations by President Bush's New Freedom Commission to screen all school children for mental illness, TeenScreen is now being administered in the nation's public school system and children are being regularly diagnosed with one, or more, disorders chosen from the close to 400 listed in the "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV" (DSM), also known as the psychiatric "Billing Bible."
The list of mental disorders to chose from when diagnosing children mentally ill with TeenScreen, are "voted" into the Billing Bible by members of the American Psychiatric Association, and include, among others, conduct disorder, avoidant personality disorder, mathematics disorder, reading disorder, disorder of written expression, general anxiety disorder, nightmare disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, and factious disorder.

A mental illness that drew a lot of ridicule recently, is called the "intermittent explosive disorder," for people who fly into occasional but unwarranted fits of rage.

Critics view TeenScreen is a main components in an overall pharmaceutical industry-backed marketing scheme pushed along by the NFC, aimed at recruiting new customers for psychiatric drugs. The NFC's report specifically identifies the target population Big Pharma is after when it states:

"Schools are in a key position to identify mental health problems early and to provide a link to appropriate services. Every day more than 52 million students attend over 114,000 schools in the U.S. When combined with the six million adults working at those schools, almost one-fifth of the population passes through the Nation's schools on any given weekday."

The TeenScreen survey is billed as a suicide prevention tool, but according to former government investigator, Allen Jones, "Teen Screen is a nefarious effort to recruit our children into the quagmire of biological psychiatry."

"The program employs dubious screening tools administered by non-professionals," he states. "It is based on misleading science and diagnostic criteria that would be downright laughable if the stakes were not so high," he adds.
Keep this free!
The NewsTarget Network is a no-profit public education organization. You can help support us and keep this content FREE by browsing our books at Truth Publishing where you'll find fascinating and practical books on natural health, disease prevention, weight loss and more!
Visit Truth Publishing


Read what your government refuses to tell you about the bird flu
"The bird flu preparedness guide that governments should publish, but refuse to."

Discover real solutions to the bird flu threat. This guide, authored by natural health reporter Mike Adams, reveals:

How to survive bird flu if you're infected.
The big vaccine lie: Why flu vaccine shots don't work.
Be virtually immune to the flu, even without a vaccine.
Alternative, underground "flu cures" that can literally save your life.
Which two mineral supplements are dirt cheap and yet provide powerful antiviral protection.
Real-world preparedness strategies for your home, family and community.
The complete bird flu preparedness checklist (you aren't safe until you've completed this list!)
Click here to learn more.

"While the idea of screening kids for mental problems seems like a good idea, it ends up being nothing more than a Drugging Dragnet," says Jim Gottstein, an attorney who represents clients harmed by the psychiatric industrial complex.
"The high rate at which we are drugging America's children with psychotropics," he says, "is a national disgrace."

"This is junk science at it's worst," says Dr Jan Johnson, MD, "follow the money, the trail leads right back to the drug companies."

Activist groups against TeenScreen have posted an online petition and plan to send it to federal, state and local lawmakers. The petition can also be used to educate people about TeenScreen because it conveys many of the facts about mental health screening and can be printed off and presented to school board members or legislators. Persons interested in signing the petition can click on the following link.

As an additional bonus to Big Pharma, Bush set it up the overall scheme so that tax payers will foot the bill for the implementation of the TeenScreen program. On October 21, 2004, he signed a bill into law that authorized $82 million to be spent over 3 years for programs like TeenScreen.

From there, the way the scheme is set up, if a child is diagnosed with a mental illness and the family can not afford the expensive regiment of psychiatric drugs, tax payers will fund the purchase of the drugs as well through public health care programs like Medicaid.

The fact is, Bush and most of his Republican puppets in Congress, would not be in office today if not for the financial support of Big Pharma. Drug companies spend hundreds of millions of dollars a year sending lobbyists to Washington to call in their markers by getting industry-friendly legislation passed.

According to a 2004, report by the consumer group, Public Citizen, drug companies, HMOs, their trade associations and industry-backed advocacy groups spent nearly $141 million on lobbying in 2003, and deployed over 950 lobbyists to do their bidding on Capitol Hill and at the White House.
Related book:
Dangerous Medicine Message Board
Bulletin board site for posting your horror stories about harmful prescription drugs, hospital stays, surgical procedures and medicine gone bad. Post your true story and read others now!
In 2003, the top 10 drug makers and trade associations spent $55.8 million on lobbying, accounting for 60% of the industry's total lobbying expenditures. A record 24 companies and trade groups each spent $1 million, or more, on lobbying in 2002.
However, spending on lobbying is a drop in the bucket when compared with the $35.9 billion in profits recorded in 2003, by the 10 top companies. The industry soared past all other sectors, with profits five-and-a-half times greater than the median for industries represented in the Fortune 500.

And, the efforts to influence lawmakers have not been limited to lobbying. Since 1997, the top 25 drug companies with the highest lobbying expenditures, also gave $48.6 million in campaign contributions, with 80% going to Republicans.

According to concerned citizen Barbara Becker, "TeenScreen and similar projects are nothing more than a stealth trolling of the general population for drug consumers."

"The roots of these projects," she says, "grow straight from the drooling over additional excessive profiteering by the pharmaceutical industry, with the blessings of too many ever-grateful politicians who also profit from it through enormous pharmaceutical political contributions."

In all fairness, it should be noted that Big Pharma has managed to cozy up with a few Democrats as well. For instance, Senator Joe Lieberman has been known to pal around with lobbyists representing drug companies that provides large contributions to his campaign.

In fact, according to Joe Conason in the July 17, 2006, New York Observer, Mr Liberman, "has literally been sleeping with one of their Washington representatives ever since his wife Hadassah joined Hill & Knowlton last year."

"The legendary lobbying and P.R. firm," Mr Conason explains, "hired her as a 'senior counselor' in its 'health and pharmaceuticals practice.'

One of the firm's clients is GlaxoSmithKline, the manufacturer of flu vaccines, as well as many other drugs, and Mrs Lieberman joined the firm in March 2006.
Healing Foods Revealed
Find a complete list of healing foods, nutritional medicine and phytonutrients at the free HealingFoodReference.com website.

"In April 2005," according to Mr Conason, "Mr. Lieberman introduced a bill that would award an array of new government 'incentives' to companies like GSK to produce more vaccines'notably patent extensions on other products, at a cost of billions to governments and consumers."
Mr Conason noted that the bill drew a critical commentary from by Mr Lieberman's hometown newspaper, the New Haven Register, titled, 'Lieberman Crafts Drug Company Perk.'

The newspaper described the bill as being even more generous to the industry than a similar proposal by Republicans. 'The government can offer incentives and guarantees for needed public health measures,' the Register said. 'But it should not write a blank check, as these bills do," it read, "to the pharmaceutical industry that has such a large cost to the public with what may be an uncertain or dubious return.'

In return for industry support, lawmakers have been very generous when doling out tax dollars to fund marketing schemes like TeenScreen. On September 21, 2005, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) announced grants of over $9.7 million in funding for the implementation of the TeenScreen Program.

"The Columbia University TeenScreen Program," the press release said, "provides early identification of mental health problems, such as depression, that can lead to suicide."

TeenScreen uses a voice computer version of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC ), and claims it can show signs of 30 disorders, according to an article by Reuters on October 13, 2003.

On March 2, 2004, TeenScreen's Executive Director, Laurie Flynn, testified at a congressional hearing and said that in the screening process, "youth complete a 10-minute self-administered questionnaire that screens for social phobia, panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, major depression, alcohol and drug abuse, and suicidality."

The goal mentioned by Dr Paul, is obviously being reached because kids are "flunking" TeenScreen all over the country. According to Anne Yates, from Colorado, when the program was piloted at two sites in that state, at the high school, 'a whopping 50% were found to be at risk of suicide.'
Medicinal Herbs
Explore a free online reference site of medicinal herbs along with which health conditions they may help. Visit HerbReference.com
'Figures from a homeless shelter,' she reports, 'were even more outrageous: 71% of the youth screened were found to have "mental disorders."
'You can bet psychiatric drugs were pushed at these kids,' Ms Yates says, 'TeenScreen is a feeder line to the drug companies.'

During an interview with award-winning investigative journalist, Kelly O'Meara, officials from the highly respected Association of American Physicians & Surgeons (AAPS), described suicide screening in schools as "a dangerous scheme that will heap even more coercive pressure on parents to medicate children with potentially dangerous side effects."

Further, they told Ms O'Meara, "even the government's own task force has concluded that mental health screening does little to prevent suicide."

Critics say, TeenScreen asks teens about normal thoughts, feelings and emotions in a way that turns them into symptoms of mental illness. Concerned parent, Dennis McLoth says, "it looks like a way to make more young people dependent on prescription drugs earlier in life when all they really need is to deal with growing up, just like we all did before there was a drug for every ailment and new ailment to justify even more new drugs."

Human rights groups contend children are being diagnosed with disorders based on nothing more than a list of behaviors. Kevin Hall, New England Director of the Citizens Commission on Human Rights, notes that 'unlike medical illnesses that are found through scientific research and discovery, mental disorders are merely groups of symptoms that are voted into existence by American Psychiatric Association committees.'

A May 20, 2006, article on TeenScreen in the National Journal, includes a admission by Steven Sharfstein, President of the American Psychiatric Association, that states: "medical science has no biological or chemical tests that can determine whether a person is depressed, suicidal, schizophrenic, or afflicted with another mental problem. There is no laboratory test that establishes a specific diagnosis."

Psychiatrist, Dr Nathaniel Lehrman says the claim that TeenScreen can reduce suicides is unsupported by any data. "It is impossible," he explains, "on cursory examination, or on the basis of the Program's brief written screening test, to detect suicidality or "mental illness," however we define it."
Another complaint heard often from activists is the fact that TeenScreen labels children mentally ill without testing for possible underlying health problems such as nutritional deficiencies, allergies, or other physical illnesses, before initiating drug treatment.

And, the medications the children end up taking as a result of the screening are the most high-priced and dangerous psychotropic drugs on the market, and include selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor antidepressants (SSRIs), like Paxil, Prozac, Zoloft, and Effexor, and atypical antipsychotics, such as Zyprexa, Risperdal, Geodon, Seroquel, Clozaril, and Abilify, and ADHD stimulant drugs such as Adderall, Dexedrine and Ritalin.

In recent years, the use of these drugs with children has escalated. An examination of prescriptions by Medco Health Solutions in 2004, for 300,000 children ages 19 and younger, concluded that for the first time in history, spending on drugs for behavior problems with kids exceeded expenditures for any other medication category, including antibiotics.

According to Dr Barry Duncan, author of the book, "What's Right With You," more than 150 million prescriptions were written for antidepressants in 2003, with sales worth more than $14 billion. And he goes on to note that the "rates of depression have not changed for thirty years," and "suicide rates, despite the millions taking antidepressants, have not reduced."

In June 2005, the Washington Post reported that despite "a dramatic increase in treatment of psychiatric disorders during the past 10 years, there has been no decrease in the rate of suicidal thoughts and behavior among adults," citing a study by researchers from Harvard Medical school and elsewhere, primarily funded by the National Institute of Mental Health.
Related article
Do Antidepressants Cure or Create Abnormal Brain States? (PLoS Medicine)
The study found that although people who attempt suicide were far more likely to be treated with antidepressants in 2001-03, compared to 1990-92, the rates of suicidal ideation, gestures and attempts remained basically unchanged, the Post said.
TeenScreen is being used as a vehicle to get kids on SSRIs, even though there has been a steady stream of warnings against treating kids with SSRIs for years, and even though the drugs are not approved for use with children. Back on June 10, 2003, British pubic health authorities issued a warning of a two-to three-fold increased risk of suicide in pediatric clinical trials during testing of SSRIs.

A week or so later, on June 18, 2003, Glaxo issued a warning to British physicians against the use of Paxil in children, acknowledging failure of clinical trials "to demonstrate efficacy in major depressive disorders and doubling the rate of reported adverse events - including suicidal thoughts and suicide attempts - compared to placebo."

On August 22, 2003, Wyeth sent warnings to UK and US healthcare professionals stating: "In pediatric clinical trials, there were increased reports of hostility and especially in Major Depressive Disorder, suicide-related adverse events such as suicidal ideation and self-harm."

On December 18, 2003, Eli Lilly issued two letters to British healthcare professionals, indicating that Prozac was not recommended for children - for any use.

During FDA hearings on SSRIs back in February 2004, researchers presented evidence showing SSRIs to be little or no more effective than placebos. Psychologist, David Antonuccio, from the University of Nevada Medical School, was part of a team that analyzed 12 studies and told the committee, 'Our conclusions were that the advantages of the antidepressants in children were so small and so trivial as to be clinically insignificant.'
Related article
Experts say antidepressant drugs cause suicides instead of preventing them
'In order to evaluate the cost effectiveness of antidepressant use in children, the committee must consider the benefits, as well as the risks,' Dr Antonuccio testified.
'Clinically meaningful benefits have not been adequately demonstrated in depressed children," he said, "therefore, no extra risk is warranted.'

'An increased risk of suicidal behavior is certainly not justified by these minimal benefits,' he warned. 'Neither are the established increased risks of other commonly reported side effects, which include agitation, insomnia, and gastrointestinal problems,' he added.

On July 21, 2004, the Journal of the American Medical Association, also reported that there was a significantly higher risk of suicide and suicidal thoughts during the first 9 days of treatment with SSRIs, and that children who were first starting treatment were 4 times more likely to think about suicide, and 38 times more likely to commit suicide and that children as young as five had committed suicide while taking these drugs.

In the fall of 2004, the FDA ordered drug makers to post a black box warning on SSRIs, the most serious warning a drug can carry. The problem is black box warnings do not stop doctors from prescribing SSRIs to children.

"Unfortunately," said Senator Charles Grassley, who had been conducting oversight of the FDA from his position as chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, in response to the news of a black box warning on SSRIs, "the poor performance data for these drugs has been coupled with the very compelling and heart-wrenching testimony from parents and other public witnesses who identify the medications themselves as triggering tragic and unexpected suicides and suicidal behavior among users."

"I understand," he continued, "that the testimony yesterday even included discussions about patients who had not been suffering from depression, yet were prescribed these powerful drugs by physicians who may perhaps have been all too ready to medicate their patients."

When reviewing studies that had previously been suppressed, the FDA found one trial on the SSRI, Paxil, with a "possibly suicide-related" risk of 6.5 percent, and a 5.4% risk of suicide attempts, compared to a 1.1% and zero, respectively in patients taking a placebo.
Related article
Psychiatric Drugs: Chemical Warfare on Humans - interview with Robert Whitaker
In fact, in 2004, Paxil maker, Glaxo, was sued by New York State Attorney General, Eliot Spitzer, for committing fraud by hiding studies that "not only failed to show any benefit for the drug in children but demonstrated that children taking Paxil were more likely to become suicidal than those taking a placebo."
In September 2005, British public health officials instructed doctors to never prescribe SSRIs to children without providing psychotherapy as well. Physicians were also told to never prescribe the drugs without trying other alternative drugs first, and to not prescribe Effexor or Paxil to children under any condition.

In addition to all the other problems with SSRIs, previously suppressed studies also show the drugs are addictive. In June 2003, Glaxo, removed labels that said Paxil was not habit-forming after thousands of patients claimed they had become addicted to the drug.

Experts warn that SSRIs can also cause children to become violent as well as suicidal. According to Dr Julian Whitaker, SSRIs cause akathisia, a mental and physical agitation that sparks self-destructive, violent behavior, and induce disassociative reactions that make patients who take the drugs insensitive to the consequences of their behavior. This is the type of drug, he says, that Eric Harris was taking when he killed his fellow students at Columbine.

Kip Kinkel was on Prozac, Dr Whitaker says, when he killed his parents and then went to his high school in Oregon, and killed two students and wounded 22 others, and says Joseph Wesbecker was also taking Prozac when he killed 7 people at a printing plant in Kentucky, before taking his own life.

In 2003, seventeen-year-old, Julie Woodward, took a test at North Penn High School, in North Wales, Pennsylvania, that said she was suffering from depression and two doctors convinced her parents, Tom and Kathy Woodward, to put her on Zoloft.

Julie's parents say they watched as her behaviors got steadily worse as soon as she began taking the drug. On the third day, Julie was arguing with her mother, and all of a sudden pushed her mother down to the floor.

Everyone in the family was shocked because Julie had never been violent before. 'It was an out-of-character act,' Tom Woodward notes.
Related article
National Paxil Protest invites antidepressant drugs victims to join public outcry against GlaxoSmithKline
Over the next few days, the usually calm Julie, became extremely irritable, could not sit still, and began pacing incessantly. She also became reclusive, her parents recall.
Six days after she began taking Zoloft, Julie hanged herself in the family's garage. Since their daughter's suicide, Tom and Kathy have become activists and have work diligently in attempt to educate others parents about the dangers of SSRIs.

Sue Weibert, is an ardent activist against TeenScreen, and has been investigating the program for well over a year. She recently found that when a school enters into a contract to administer the TeenScreen survey, it must agree to screen a minimum of 200 children per season.

According to Ms Weibert, a recent study showed 33% of the kids screened test positive, and quoting a figure provided by Dr Shafer seven years ago in 1999, the study said the cost was about $37 per child per screening.

So all total, 200 times a rounded off fee of $35 would amount to $7,000 in tax dollars just for the screening. After that, the 33% who screen positive are sent for a "further assessment" at an average cost of $250 to parents.

Screening promoters claim that currently, only one out of every 3 children who are mentally ill receives treatment. "That being the case," says Jan Eastgate, the International President of the Citizen's Commission on Human Rights, "with mass screening already in play, if we do not act to prevent this, we can very shortly expect to have 30 million American children prescribed mind-altering drugs."

Parents are beginning to strike back against schools when their children are screened without their consent. Last year, an Indiana high school was sued for subjecting 15-year-old student to mental health testing with TeenScreen and diagnosing the teen with two mental illnesses, without her parents' knowledge or consent.

A Massachusetts department of education investigation recently determined that a counselor at the Thomas Hamilton Primary School violated federal law in April 2005, when a student, who was enrolled in a special education class due to a speech delay, was screened for ADHD, without parental consent.
Related article
State-sponsored medical terrorism: Texas authorities arrest parents, kidnap their teenage daughter, and force her through chemotherapy against her will
The investigation followed complaints by the mother that the counselor had pressured her to put her daughter on drugs for 3 years. The mother said she did not give consent for a mental evaluation and pulled her children out of the school because of the incident.
Wilmette, Illinois, attorney, S Randolph Kretchmar, defends patients who are violated by the psychiatric industry, and says he is dead against drugging and labeling children with mental health disorders. 'The great crime of psychiatry and the pushers of psychiatric drugs,' he advises, 'is that they have purposely confused us to sell their products.'

'What the drugs do is disable people,' he says, 'it's just that simple.'

'They may disable people from behaving badly,' he explains, 'but they also disable people in other ways, generally, neurologically.'

He points out that a slow reader or difficult middle-schooler is no threat to public safety. 'When it becomes popular,' he says, 'to neurologically disable children from being disagreeable to their teachers and their parents, we descend into some horrific barbarism, and sacrifice the future of the human race.'

This month, the CCHR issued a report titled, "The Side Effects of Common Psychiatric Drugs," that explains the various adverse effects of psychiatric drugs and defines the complex medical terms that often makes it hard for readers to understand the side effects. The report also includes the recent FDA warnings about specific drugs, as well as information, they say drug makers have kept hidden for years. Copies of the report can be obtained from their web site.

(Evelyn Pringle can be contacted at: evelyn.pringle@sbcglobal.net. She is a columnist for OpEd News and an investigative journalist focused on exposing corruption in government and corporate America.)
Related article
Tufts University study shows more than half of psychiatric DSM-IV authors have financial links to Big Pharma
Action items:
• Post your comment on this article (click here) "Here's what I think..."
• Email this article to a friend (click here) "Hey, check this out!"
• Be social! Share this article on: NewsVine | digg | del.icio.us
• Permalink to this article: http://www.NewsTarget.com/020092.html
• Reprint this article: Non-commercial reprint OK, cite source and provide clickable link

RAF_Ogg
This hits too close to home.
My 2nd daughter (of 4 kids) Is exceptionally bright.
She is very smart,,has a critical mind,,,and a strong will.
While me and my wife were seperated and going through divorce..
amist all the trama divorce brings to families,,,,the publik skool decided that she needed to be "screened" for adhd

Long story short,,,I got into a screaming match with the doctor. after my wife bought into the "many gifted children NEED to be drugged" schpeel
(please pray for my wife and kids)

It seems they are passing out riddlyn and other drugs to children as if they were candy.

Here in ohio,,if you sell dope on school grounds,,you go to prison,,,UNLESS, you have a doctors note,,,,Then,,if you go against the doctors orders,,you are a bad parent and guilty of neglect.

(my smart kid KNOWS what they are trying to give her,,she knows she doesnt like how it makes her feel,,and she hides the pills in her mouth and spits them out as soon as she can)

The enemy is after our children.


1LikeDeborah
Yeah Ritalin is is nasty stuff- I read that it is more potent than cocaine and permenantly alters your brain chemistry. ohmy.gif blink.gif wacko.gif

Sick absolutely sick!- and they are passing this stuff around like candy! Many families have had DCYF steal kids, because parents refused to durg their children. Even now I have to guard this I have to work with a GAL and she is always "giddy" about suggesting my daughter has ADHD because her school says "she has trouble focussing."(she's probably bored- LOL), and could not be further from the truth. My daughter is very samrt, but definetly not hyper and off the wall at all. LOL

I think we need to be more aware of this and pray, Satan is surely after our kids because they are the future generation and he is trying to steal, kill and destroy.(What's new?!) There is a hidden agenda and most do not know that psychology and psychiatry is founded by Humanists and Nazis. Humanism both is considered to be a religion both under Supreme Court Case Law and by their own declaration. If any have ever read the Humanist Manifestos- it is a scary document and they intend not only to run the schools but promote "mental hygeine"(i.e. fancy term for brainwashing) as they put it.




flyingsquirrel
the majority of our western modern medical knowledge...including drug treatments...came out of the experiments performed on Jews in concertration camps...when you talk to doctors about Dr. Mengula they talk about him like a hero because they learned so much from his gruesome and inhuman experiments...I even saw a documentry on the medical profession that actually claimed that those experiments on Jews weren't really so bad...and this is what gets passed on in medical schools! The largest drugs companies in the world were founded by Nazies....our CIA even invited former Nazies to meeting so they could learn their interogation techniques on suspected terrorists! The US military developed missle technology for the mission to the moon through the help THE top Nazi rocket scientist...George Bush's grandfather single handedly financed the NAZI party....the gov't shut the man's business after the war when they found out...many of the upper class American families at the time, who still have political positions today, believed in the Nazi's cause as heroic....there has been an image circulating on the internet that I have no idea if its real but claims to be of military installation with a bldg in the shape of a swastika on it...and the military has been using Nazi military operation names translated into english when naming operations in IRAQ. The patriot act is the clone of the Nazi legislation that allowed them to begin targeting Jews...anymore, USA seems to have closer ties to the Nazi's than Germany....
knownbeforetime
My school didn't try to drug me but they did try to dumb me down. They kept trying to keep me in remedial classes in elementary school. Come to find out I have an IQ of 130...
LightTarrier
Yes, the pharmaceutical cabals wield far too much power in this country. I heard on the news months ago that the AMA is also lobbying congress for more control over the patient, attempting to gain the power to force adults onto meds.

Anyone find the name of Bush's pet project, "New Freedom Commission," as Orwellian as I do? It's right up there with "Freedom is Slavery" and "Knowledge is Ignorance." Where's the freedom in forcing America's children onto psychotropic drugs??? It's not just children, either. Pregnant and nursing women are also on the "mental illness screening" list. Can you imagine ~ pregnant or nursing and you're forced onto medication that will likely harm your infant or what, the state will take your infant?! Unbelievable.

A government of, by and for the people fears the people, a dictatorship does not. What's it sound like we have?

1LikeDeborah
QUOTE(knownbeforetime @ Aug 25 2006, 06:29 PM) [snapback]81154[/snapback]

My school didn't try to drug me but they did try to dumb me down. They kept trying to keep me in remedial classes in elementary school. Come to find out I have an IQ of 130...


I guess tha means your pretty smart cookie and God gave you brains. smile.gif
NoFool
I can just see it now...devout christians will likely be diagnosed officially as schizophrenics and given psychotrophic drugs. You tell a psychiatrist God healed you of cancer? DELUSION! That'll be a year's supply of Haldol for you-- maximum strength-- along with mandatory monthly bloodwork to make sure you are taking it as prescribed. Hey, if I was America's Dictator and I was afraid of a bunch of christians, that's how I'd do it lol. Hmmm...you may also have to foot the bill yourself and be told you can only pay via verichip? Wouldn't suprise me if a scenario like this would come to pass within 10 years.

Please read a little about shcizophrenia....you'd be suprised just how easily so many vocal christians could be classified as having this should Adolf Bush bring his plans to full fruitation.
flyingsquirrel
Got to move this up...this needs to be prayed about and voted down
gregg
This has been going on since the 1950s. It is nothing new. That is why we are in so much trouble now because all of these old men and presidents and senators and representatives have been enjoying their cocktails of liquor and pills. John F. Kennedy was a major player in that with Marilyn Monroe. President Clinton was a major player in the use of cocaine and that got him impeached.

Pharmacology is the magic of the bible. That is why the bible kills. Look it up! Read about it!
flyingsquirrel
QUOTE(gregg @ Aug 29 2006, 01:14 PM) [snapback]81745[/snapback]

This has been going on since the 1950s. It is nothing new. That is why we are in so much trouble now because all of these old men and presidents and senators and representatives have been enjoying their cocktails of liquor and pills. John F. Kennedy was a major player in that with Marilyn Monroe. President Clinton was a major player in the use of cocaine and that got him impeached.

Pharmacology is the magic of the bible. That is why the bible kills. Look it up! Read about it!



Can you elaborate on the statement "Pharmacology is the magic of the bible. That is why the bible kills. Look it up! Read about it!" and give examples...just to clarify
gregg
Rev 21:8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, (5332) and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

(5332) sorcerers

φαρμακεύς
pharmakeus
far-mak-yoos'
From φάρμακον pharmakon (a drug, that is, spell giving potion); a druggist (“pharmacist”) or poisoner, that is, (by extension) a magician: - sorcerer.

Rev 22:15 For without are dogs, and sorcerers, (5333) and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a lie.

(5333) sorcerers

φαρμακός
pharmakos
far-mak-os'
The same as G5332: - sorcerer.

It is evident now by all of the reports through all of the studies on the vaccines and the new drugs they are coming out with and with the over-the-counter medications that it has absolutely taken everybodies mind from them. For the common cough or cold it's off to the doctor and all they do is write some kind of prescription for medicine from a PHARMACY (the house of sorcery).

No, the bible doesn't kill, pharmacies do!

But the idea of the pharmacies and doctors doing the healing came from Moses and his serpent on the pole in the desert and the medical symbol of the double serpent around the sword. The caduceus.

The caduceus is the legendary herald's wand of the Greek God Hermes (Roman, Mercury). This symbol, a winged staff entwined by twin serpents, is nearly universal, found in Egypt, Mesopotamia, and India, where it is always a symbol of harmony and balance. The symbol may have originally been a symbol of the sovereignity of the Goddess Tanit.
LightTarrier
Interesting, Gregg. Very good point. I looked it up and sure enough, sorcerer comes from the word pharmekos, a pharmacist or poisoner! Thanks for pointing that out.
kim48
sorcerer, I learn about this a few years ago. I read it differently but not a whole lot. I see it as drug abuse that is going on in this world. Look at the meth, people will sell their soul for the drug. The drugs are causing abuse in the family, schools, communities all over the world. Most of the sexual abuse now is from drug abuse. The killing are worse now than ever before and over 60% of them is from drugs. Yes, we have drugs that people go to the pharmacies for and they become addited also.
I feel in Rev. 9:20-21 the top 7 sins of tribulation, SORCERER is drug abuse that is taking place now and a good one to look at is the meth but there are meny other also.
Kim
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.