http://www.divulgence.net/Coverup.html
SOME QUOTES FROM THE SITE:
The actual shifts occurred on Dec 4 & 6, 2006. SOHO (NASA/ESA) & NOAA claim there was a historic solar flare on Dec 5 & 6, 2006. Supposedly the largest in recorded history. They also claimed that this flare knocked down the world GPS satellite system. Yet, they did not announce this to the public until after all global scientists met in April 2007.
There are no solar images for Dec 5 or 6, 2006. The dozens of solar images recorded daily and some twice hourly are all missing on the very dates they claim this historic flare occurred.
#1 If this had indeed been a solar flare of historic proportions, NASA, SOHO, NOAA, & NWS would have been bragging about the data. They certainly would not have removed the images of this event... and oddly enough, their webpage of historic solar flares does not list these dates either. Click here to see that page.
#2 Check out the menu of NASA's (SOHO) solar images. Those dates are missing from every solar
________________________________________________________________________________________
Have you noticed how the meteorologists on TV are now trying to focus on "The best weather in America?" Or how they seem to avoid mentioning the unusual weather? Did you know that none of the meteorologists on TV are allowed to declare a tornado warning or any other severe weather warning unless the National Weather Service issues the warning first? There was a meteorologist in Little Rock, Arkansas a few years ago who saw a tornado coming on the Doppler radar. The NWS refused to issue a Tornado warning. So he took it upon himself to contact the City officials to set off the tornado sirens and contacted the local airport to reroute planes. Although this local TV meteorologist saved a lot of people, the NWS was going to revoke his license for issuing a Tornado warning without their approval. So all of the weather experts are at the mercy of the National Weather Service. Without their licenses, they cannot continue in their jobs. A good reason as to why they are all so quiet.
(THIS I CAN VOUCH FOR MYSELF, RECENTLY, WE HAD A "POSSIBLE" TORNADO SIGHTED BY A WEATHER SPOTTER HERE IN COLUMBUS OH, BUT THE METEOROLGIST STATED THAT HE WAS NOT ALLOWED TO TALK ABOUT IT UNTIL THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE SAID HE COULD....)
Full Version: Earth's Axis Shifted Suddenly By Additional 26 Degrees
The earth's axis has shifted...have you noticed that summer is lasting about 2 months longer? it seems that all of seasons have shifted 2 months forward...Here is an article explaining the earth shift caused by the earthquake on December 26, 2006...
What's Really Happened to the Terrestrial Axis?
A short explanation about the effects caused by the earthquake in the Indian
Ocean to our planet's rotational axis
by Alfonso Mantero
Earth's South Pole
Earth is similar, more or less, to a ball which is suspended in space. This
ball is not still, rather it performs a good number of motions. The sum of
all of those motions is called global motion. The rotation around the Sun is
one of those motions: our planet follows an elliptical orbit while rotating
around it. This orbit lies on a plane (orbital plane or ecliptic plane)
thanks to that law of physics known as conservation of angular momentum.
Earth rotates around the Sun and while doing that it also rotates upon
itself, that is, along an axis passing through its baricentre. The direction
this axis has in space, that is tilting with respect to orbital plane is
dependent on forces external to our planet, eg. the gravitational attraction
coming from the Sun and the Moon. These phenomena are real, they have been
measured in the past and have always shown a progressive activity. They have
been measured with highly-precision tools over years. But humans may
appreciate them over extremely long periods, such as millennia. Equinox
precessions (one of the reasons invalidating astrology) are an example of
phenomena changing over long periods. No phenomena, excepted an impact with
a celestial body of huge dimensions, such as an asteroid, are able to
suddenly vary the tilting of the terrestrial axis with
respect to orbital plane.
Now, one may ask what do geologists from the Centro di Geodesia Spaziale of
the Italian Space Agency (ASI) mean when they say the quake in the Indian
Ocean caused the terrestrial axis to shift. Surely none is arguing with the
laws of physics. The experts explained that what is changed is the tilting
of the terrestrial rotation with respect to Earth, not to the orbit. Let us
see how this can happen.
At the beginning of this article, we said that the Earth is similar to a
ball which is suspended in space and rotating along its axis (please bear in
mind that this example is meaningful only over a short period of time). A
train travelling at a certain speed has what is commonly known as "a certain
inertia" (physicists call it quantity of motion); in the same way, a
rotating body has its "rotational inertia", which is the angular momentum.
The angular momentum is there each time a body rotates in any way.
A body which has an angular momentum is difficult to move, and this is
because the angular momentum is preserved. An example for that is the
direction of a wheel's axis, which is fixed. This is why a bike which is not
moving needs a support, while you can safely remove the small wheels when
you are more or less able at cycling.
In order to modify the direction of a body's rotational axis, its angular
momentum has to be modified and, to reach this result, external forces are
necessary. During the earthquake occurred on December 26, great forces came
to action. But they were internal to our Earth, that is they were generated
by the motion of some masses and they affected other masses on our planet.
Now, those kind of forces cannot modify the angular momentum of a rotating
body (Earth is an example of rotating body).
When a body is rotating freely, it rotates along what physicists call
principal axis: each body has three of them, along which the body may
rotate. In the Earth, its three axes are dependent on the way masses are
distributed inside our planet. An earthquake is a sudden motion of
terrestrial masses. That motion may vary the distribution of those masses.
Hence, the principal axes may shift a little.
Having said that, the final step is to understand what has happened to our
planet. On one hand we have the angular momentum which is preserved. On the
other hand, our Earth now needs to rotate along a main axis which is
different from the main axis along which our planet has been rotating a few
seconds ago. So, the solution is to align the new main axis with the
rotational axis, that is possible through a rotation that will bring the two
axes in line. We will see this as a variation of two thousandth arcsecond:
now the "North Pole" sign has to be moved of about 6 centimetres toward
Greenwich. In other words, our coordinates have slightly changed: our
latitude has increased, toward North. From an astronomical point of view,
the apparent locations of stars have changed. In particular, the Pole star
is now 2 thousandth arcsecond higher, and subsequently all other stars.
So the experts said. We would like to underline that the motion was
extremely small: during a year, the pole moves of more than 6 cm. In the
previous years, it has moved several metres. While moving, it follows a
spiral-pattern which is of uttermost interest to scientists. The anomaly in
our case, is that the 6-cm motion happened all of a sudden. This motion will
not bring any effect on weather and it will be noticeable and measurable
only through extremely sophisticated tools, used by the experts.
Translation: Claudia Gioia
What's Really Happened to the Terrestrial Axis?
A short explanation about the effects caused by the earthquake in the Indian
Ocean to our planet's rotational axis
by Alfonso Mantero
Earth's South Pole
Earth is similar, more or less, to a ball which is suspended in space. This
ball is not still, rather it performs a good number of motions. The sum of
all of those motions is called global motion. The rotation around the Sun is
one of those motions: our planet follows an elliptical orbit while rotating
around it. This orbit lies on a plane (orbital plane or ecliptic plane)
thanks to that law of physics known as conservation of angular momentum.
Earth rotates around the Sun and while doing that it also rotates upon
itself, that is, along an axis passing through its baricentre. The direction
this axis has in space, that is tilting with respect to orbital plane is
dependent on forces external to our planet, eg. the gravitational attraction
coming from the Sun and the Moon. These phenomena are real, they have been
measured in the past and have always shown a progressive activity. They have
been measured with highly-precision tools over years. But humans may
appreciate them over extremely long periods, such as millennia. Equinox
precessions (one of the reasons invalidating astrology) are an example of
phenomena changing over long periods. No phenomena, excepted an impact with
a celestial body of huge dimensions, such as an asteroid, are able to
suddenly vary the tilting of the terrestrial axis with
respect to orbital plane.
Now, one may ask what do geologists from the Centro di Geodesia Spaziale of
the Italian Space Agency (ASI) mean when they say the quake in the Indian
Ocean caused the terrestrial axis to shift. Surely none is arguing with the
laws of physics. The experts explained that what is changed is the tilting
of the terrestrial rotation with respect to Earth, not to the orbit. Let us
see how this can happen.
At the beginning of this article, we said that the Earth is similar to a
ball which is suspended in space and rotating along its axis (please bear in
mind that this example is meaningful only over a short period of time). A
train travelling at a certain speed has what is commonly known as "a certain
inertia" (physicists call it quantity of motion); in the same way, a
rotating body has its "rotational inertia", which is the angular momentum.
The angular momentum is there each time a body rotates in any way.
A body which has an angular momentum is difficult to move, and this is
because the angular momentum is preserved. An example for that is the
direction of a wheel's axis, which is fixed. This is why a bike which is not
moving needs a support, while you can safely remove the small wheels when
you are more or less able at cycling.
In order to modify the direction of a body's rotational axis, its angular
momentum has to be modified and, to reach this result, external forces are
necessary. During the earthquake occurred on December 26, great forces came
to action. But they were internal to our Earth, that is they were generated
by the motion of some masses and they affected other masses on our planet.
Now, those kind of forces cannot modify the angular momentum of a rotating
body (Earth is an example of rotating body).
When a body is rotating freely, it rotates along what physicists call
principal axis: each body has three of them, along which the body may
rotate. In the Earth, its three axes are dependent on the way masses are
distributed inside our planet. An earthquake is a sudden motion of
terrestrial masses. That motion may vary the distribution of those masses.
Hence, the principal axes may shift a little.
Having said that, the final step is to understand what has happened to our
planet. On one hand we have the angular momentum which is preserved. On the
other hand, our Earth now needs to rotate along a main axis which is
different from the main axis along which our planet has been rotating a few
seconds ago. So, the solution is to align the new main axis with the
rotational axis, that is possible through a rotation that will bring the two
axes in line. We will see this as a variation of two thousandth arcsecond:
now the "North Pole" sign has to be moved of about 6 centimetres toward
Greenwich. In other words, our coordinates have slightly changed: our
latitude has increased, toward North. From an astronomical point of view,
the apparent locations of stars have changed. In particular, the Pole star
is now 2 thousandth arcsecond higher, and subsequently all other stars.
So the experts said. We would like to underline that the motion was
extremely small: during a year, the pole moves of more than 6 cm. In the
previous years, it has moved several metres. While moving, it follows a
spiral-pattern which is of uttermost interest to scientists. The anomaly in
our case, is that the 6-cm motion happened all of a sudden. This motion will
not bring any effect on weather and it will be noticeable and measurable
only through extremely sophisticated tools, used by the experts.
Translation: Claudia Gioia
Here is confirmation from NASA...
No Safe Place
02.22.2007
February 22, 2007: Imagine hiking across Antarctica, through ice, cold and bitter wind, enduring months of hardship, and finally arriving at the doorstep of the South Pole itself.
At that moment you get hit by a Sahara sandstorm.
That's the analogy scientists are using to describe what happened to the ESA-NASA Ulysses spacecraft last December. "Ulysses was approaching the South Pole of the sun when it was 'sandblasted' by a cloud of high-energy particles—protons, electrons and heavy ions," says Arik Posner, Ulysses Program Scientist at NASA headquarters. The cloud was as foreign to the sun's South Pole as a Sahara sandstorm would be to Antarctica.
The strange tale begins on Dec. 5, 2006.
Astronomers were in a state of excitement due to the sudden appearance of a giant and angry-looking sunspot on the sun's eastern limb—"sunspot 930," says Posner. On Dec. 5th it exploded, producing one of the strongest solar flares of the past 25 years. On the "Richter scale" of solar flares, X1 is considered intense; the Dec. 5th flare was an X9. A flash of X-rays announced the blast to sensors in Earth orbit, and moments later a cloud of protons, electrons and heavy ions came rushing out of the blast site. This is the cloud that pelted Ulysses.
Right: An X9-class solar flare on Dec. 5, 2006, recorded by the GOES-13 Solar X-ray Imager. Credit: NOAA.
The process repeated on Dec. 6th (X6) and Dec. 13th (X3). Each explosion created its own cloud of high-energy particles. "We call these clouds 'radiation storms,'" says Posner. "They are common after big flares."
What's strange about these storms is where they went—to the South Pole. "All three storms were detected by the Ulysses spacecraft," says University of New Hampshire physicist Bruce McKibben. He is principal investigator for COSPIN (Cosmic and Solar Particle INvestigation), an array of sensors onboard Ulysses that counts high energy particles. "The Dec. 6th event was particularly strong and rich in heavy ions."
The Dec. 6th storm was so strong, in fact, "that if Earth had been where Ulysses was, we would have experienced a full-fledged Ground-Level Event," says Prof. Bernd Heber of the Institute for Experimental and Applied Physics in Keil, Germany. In other words, the particles were capable of tunneling all the way through Earth’s atmosphere to reach the ground. Heber is principle investigator for the Kiel Electron Telescope (KET), a sensor onboard Ulysses able to detect such super-energetic electrons, protons and ions.
Above: Heavy ions (Z>2) counted by Ulysses over the sun's south pole vs. ACE over the sun's equator in Dec. 2006. [More]
These observations add up to "a big puzzle," says McKibben. Sunspot 930 was near the sun's equator, while Ulysses was over the sun's South Pole. The sun's magnetic field should have kept the storms bottled up at low latitudes. How did they reach Ulysses?
It's a puzzle NASA is keen to solve. Solar radiation storms can cause communication blackouts on Earth; they can disable satellites in Earth-orbit; and in extreme cases they could be deadly to astronauts. "We need to be able to predict the trajectory of these storms," says Posner.
The key is the sun's magnetic field. Just as Earth's magnetic field guides compass needles, the sun’s magnetic field guides radiation storms. "Radiation storms consist of charged particles which naturally follow lines of magnetic force."
To forecast the path of a radiation storm, researchers have in the past relied on the "Parker spiral," a pioneering magnetic model developed by University of Chicago physicist Eugene Parker. According to his work, the sun's magnetic field emerges radially from the sun's surface and spirals outward into the solar system. "The spiral shape is caused by the spinning motion of the sun," explains Posner. "It's like a spiral stream of water from a spinning lawn sprinkler."
Right: The Parker Spiral. Image credit: Steve Suess, NASA/MSFC. [More]
The Parker spiral makes a straightforward prediction: Radiation storms that begin near the equator should remain near the equator. A storm might expand into the solar system and hit Earth, which is not far off the sun’s equatorial plane, but it should not hit Ulysses over the sun's South Pole.
Clearly, there's more to the story than a graceful spiral. The real solar magnetic field may contain kinks and twists that provide a polar passage, a route storms can travel from equator to poles. There is evidence for the idea: In 2000 and 2001, the last Solar Max, the sun's magnetic field was full of convoluted, non-Parkerian structures. "During that time, Ulysses experienced six high-latitude radiation storms," notes McKibben: data.
Mapping and understanding these passages, if they exist, is work for the future. Meanwhile, one thing is clear: "There is no place in the inner solar system completely safe from radiation storms," says Posner.
No Safe Place
02.22.2007
February 22, 2007: Imagine hiking across Antarctica, through ice, cold and bitter wind, enduring months of hardship, and finally arriving at the doorstep of the South Pole itself.
At that moment you get hit by a Sahara sandstorm.
That's the analogy scientists are using to describe what happened to the ESA-NASA Ulysses spacecraft last December. "Ulysses was approaching the South Pole of the sun when it was 'sandblasted' by a cloud of high-energy particles—protons, electrons and heavy ions," says Arik Posner, Ulysses Program Scientist at NASA headquarters. The cloud was as foreign to the sun's South Pole as a Sahara sandstorm would be to Antarctica.
The strange tale begins on Dec. 5, 2006.
Astronomers were in a state of excitement due to the sudden appearance of a giant and angry-looking sunspot on the sun's eastern limb—"sunspot 930," says Posner. On Dec. 5th it exploded, producing one of the strongest solar flares of the past 25 years. On the "Richter scale" of solar flares, X1 is considered intense; the Dec. 5th flare was an X9. A flash of X-rays announced the blast to sensors in Earth orbit, and moments later a cloud of protons, electrons and heavy ions came rushing out of the blast site. This is the cloud that pelted Ulysses.
Right: An X9-class solar flare on Dec. 5, 2006, recorded by the GOES-13 Solar X-ray Imager. Credit: NOAA.
The process repeated on Dec. 6th (X6) and Dec. 13th (X3). Each explosion created its own cloud of high-energy particles. "We call these clouds 'radiation storms,'" says Posner. "They are common after big flares."
What's strange about these storms is where they went—to the South Pole. "All three storms were detected by the Ulysses spacecraft," says University of New Hampshire physicist Bruce McKibben. He is principal investigator for COSPIN (Cosmic and Solar Particle INvestigation), an array of sensors onboard Ulysses that counts high energy particles. "The Dec. 6th event was particularly strong and rich in heavy ions."
The Dec. 6th storm was so strong, in fact, "that if Earth had been where Ulysses was, we would have experienced a full-fledged Ground-Level Event," says Prof. Bernd Heber of the Institute for Experimental and Applied Physics in Keil, Germany. In other words, the particles were capable of tunneling all the way through Earth’s atmosphere to reach the ground. Heber is principle investigator for the Kiel Electron Telescope (KET), a sensor onboard Ulysses able to detect such super-energetic electrons, protons and ions.
Above: Heavy ions (Z>2) counted by Ulysses over the sun's south pole vs. ACE over the sun's equator in Dec. 2006. [More]
These observations add up to "a big puzzle," says McKibben. Sunspot 930 was near the sun's equator, while Ulysses was over the sun's South Pole. The sun's magnetic field should have kept the storms bottled up at low latitudes. How did they reach Ulysses?
It's a puzzle NASA is keen to solve. Solar radiation storms can cause communication blackouts on Earth; they can disable satellites in Earth-orbit; and in extreme cases they could be deadly to astronauts. "We need to be able to predict the trajectory of these storms," says Posner.
The key is the sun's magnetic field. Just as Earth's magnetic field guides compass needles, the sun’s magnetic field guides radiation storms. "Radiation storms consist of charged particles which naturally follow lines of magnetic force."
To forecast the path of a radiation storm, researchers have in the past relied on the "Parker spiral," a pioneering magnetic model developed by University of Chicago physicist Eugene Parker. According to his work, the sun's magnetic field emerges radially from the sun's surface and spirals outward into the solar system. "The spiral shape is caused by the spinning motion of the sun," explains Posner. "It's like a spiral stream of water from a spinning lawn sprinkler."
Right: The Parker Spiral. Image credit: Steve Suess, NASA/MSFC. [More]
The Parker spiral makes a straightforward prediction: Radiation storms that begin near the equator should remain near the equator. A storm might expand into the solar system and hit Earth, which is not far off the sun’s equatorial plane, but it should not hit Ulysses over the sun's South Pole.
Clearly, there's more to the story than a graceful spiral. The real solar magnetic field may contain kinks and twists that provide a polar passage, a route storms can travel from equator to poles. There is evidence for the idea: In 2000 and 2001, the last Solar Max, the sun's magnetic field was full of convoluted, non-Parkerian structures. "During that time, Ulysses experienced six high-latitude radiation storms," notes McKibben: data.
Mapping and understanding these passages, if they exist, is work for the future. Meanwhile, one thing is clear: "There is no place in the inner solar system completely safe from radiation storms," says Posner.
Here is still more info on the flares...
http://www.chabotspace.org/vsc/solar/hinod...-1213-flare.asp
http://www.chabotspace.org/vsc/solar/hinod...-1213-flare.asp
Will this makes me very mad. I can't believe that these losers would but peoples life in danger that way, and only so they can be the first to say they seen it when they didn't. There isn't to much they could do if those that are in this line of work all took a stand against them for doing this, or those that lose families members take a stand against this.
I hate big goverment!!!
I hate big goverment!!!
QUOTE(flyingsquirrel @ Aug 29 2007, 04:36 PM) [snapback]120398[/snapback]
http://www.divulgence.net/Coverup.html
SOME QUOTES FROM THE SITE:
The actual shifts occurred on Dec 4 & 6, 2006. SOHO (NASA/ESA) & NOAA claim there was a historic solar flare on Dec 5 & 6, 2006. Supposedly the largest in recorded history. They also claimed that this flare knocked down the world GPS satellite system. Yet, they did not announce this to the public until after all global scientists met in April 2007.
There are no solar images for Dec 5 or 6, 2006. The dozens of solar images recorded daily and some twice hourly are all missing on the very dates they claim this historic flare occurred.
#1 If this had indeed been a solar flare of historic proportions, NASA, SOHO, NOAA, & NWS would have been bragging about the data. They certainly would not have removed the images of this event... and oddly enough, their webpage of historic solar flares does not list these dates either. Click here to see that page.
#2 Check out the menu of NASA's (SOHO) solar images. Those dates are missing from every solar
________________________________________________________________________________________
Have you noticed how the meteorologists on TV are now trying to focus on "The best weather in America?" Or how they seem to avoid mentioning the unusual weather? Did you know that none of the meteorologists on TV are allowed to declare a tornado warning or any other severe weather warning unless the National Weather Service issues the warning first? There was a meteorologist in Little Rock, Arkansas a few years ago who saw a tornado coming on the Doppler radar. The NWS refused to issue a Tornado warning. So he took it upon himself to contact the City officials to set off the tornado sirens and contacted the local airport to reroute planes. Although this local TV meteorologist saved a lot of people, the NWS was going to revoke his license for issuing a Tornado warning without their approval. So all of the weather experts are at the mercy of the National Weather Service. Without their licenses, they cannot continue in their jobs. A good reason as to why they are all so quiet.
(THIS I CAN VOUCH FOR MYSELF, RECENTLY, WE HAD A "POSSIBLE" TORNADO SIGHTED BY A WEATHER SPOTTER HERE IN COLUMBUS OH, BUT THE METEOROLGIST STATED THAT HE WAS NOT ALLOWED TO TALK ABOUT IT UNTIL THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE SAID HE COULD....)
As to the part in red, frankly, no. I work as an engineer at an ABC affiliate station. I don't think I can count the number of times that Sam Champion has mentioned the words "unusual weather" or "wild weather" in his weather segments.
As far as the rest is concerned, I've copied this to our local meteorologist for clarification. A few years back, our local meteorologist called a tornado that was going to go down main street of a local town. He suffered no retributions.
In Christ for truth,
Mike
#@@ 
^&* ***** 
TINGGGG....
^&* ***** TINGGGG....
I for one believe this is a pile of xxxx, it is ludicrous in the extreme. If one begins to check on the so called facts, one begins to discover that there are many half truths represented as truth. One reason for the missing photos is that the systems were overwhelmed (i.e. they were not able to record images… duh). Now if there were a true shift as described, some things would not be the same. Such as reference points in the sky (i.e. stars would appear in different positions, satellite dishes would not be pointing to their proper satellites). I know for a fact, that mine is still pointing to the proper satellite. And no I did have to re-align my dish. I will not exhort anyone with a plea to listen to me I just ask that you check out this for yourself.
Earth's Axis Tilt Has Recently Increased by An Additional 26 Degrees (Now at 49.5 Degrees) … Article Debunked as a Hoax!!!!
http://www.quatloos.com/qforum/viewtopic.php?t=1254
More Information and links: (Please check it out for yourselves)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16059571/
By Robert Roy Britt
Updated: 5:54 p.m. ET Dec 5, 2006
The sun is just past its low-point in an 11-year cycle of activity. But big eruptions can happen anytime. In fact, one just did.
A major X-9 flare erupted Tuesday morning, at 5:35 a.m. ET. The flare emanated from a large sunspot, numbered 929, which is just coming into view around the eastern limb of the sun.
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=2726519
By NED POTTER
Dec. 15, 2006
[url="java script:void(0);"][/url]A large electromagnetic "storm" has broken out on the face of the sun, sending masses of charged subatomic particles through the space that surrounds planet Earth.
Images from the SOHO space probe -- short for Solar and Heliospheric Observatory -- showed a bright flare near the sun's equator on Wednesday, and another was reported by ground-based observatories today.
Several of SOHO's sensors were temporarily overwhelmed by the amount of radiation, engineers said.
Such flares, known as coronal mass ejections, are actually fairly common, scientists say. Earth is well protected by both its atmosphere and its magnetic field.
http://gps.ece.cornell.edu/spaceweather.html
<h1 style="margin-bottom: 24pt; text-align: center;" align="center">Space Weather and GPS</h1>
The following links are PDF articles of Space Weather effects on Global Positioning Systems
A Beginner's Guide to Space Weather and GPS
Observed solar radio burst effects on GPS/Wide Area Augmentation System carrier-to-noise ratio
6 December 2006 solar radio burst associated with the X-6 flare at 1845 UT
4 April 2007 NOAA SWEF Press Release
26 April 2007 NOAA SWW Presentation on Solar Radio Bursts (18.1 MB)
Movie depicting loss of GPS satellite observations due to solar radio burst on 6 Dec. 2006. Data taken from random sampling of IGS network receivers. The color of the dots represents the number of dual-frequency code observations made to each satellite. (15 MB)
Earth's Axis Tilt Has Recently Increased by An Additional 26 Degrees (Now at 49.5 Degrees) … Article Debunked as a Hoax!!!!
http://www.quatloos.com/qforum/viewtopic.php?t=1254
More Information and links: (Please check it out for yourselves)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16059571/
By Robert Roy Britt
Updated: 5:54 p.m. ET Dec 5, 2006
The sun is just past its low-point in an 11-year cycle of activity. But big eruptions can happen anytime. In fact, one just did.
A major X-9 flare erupted Tuesday morning, at 5:35 a.m. ET. The flare emanated from a large sunspot, numbered 929, which is just coming into view around the eastern limb of the sun.
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=2726519
By NED POTTER
Dec. 15, 2006
[url="java script:void(0);"][/url]A large electromagnetic "storm" has broken out on the face of the sun, sending masses of charged subatomic particles through the space that surrounds planet Earth.
Images from the SOHO space probe -- short for Solar and Heliospheric Observatory -- showed a bright flare near the sun's equator on Wednesday, and another was reported by ground-based observatories today.
Several of SOHO's sensors were temporarily overwhelmed by the amount of radiation, engineers said.
Such flares, known as coronal mass ejections, are actually fairly common, scientists say. Earth is well protected by both its atmosphere and its magnetic field.
http://gps.ece.cornell.edu/spaceweather.html
<h1 style="margin-bottom: 24pt; text-align: center;" align="center">Space Weather and GPS</h1>
The following links are PDF articles of Space Weather effects on Global Positioning Systems
A Beginner's Guide to Space Weather and GPS
Observed solar radio burst effects on GPS/Wide Area Augmentation System carrier-to-noise ratio
6 December 2006 solar radio burst associated with the X-6 flare at 1845 UT
4 April 2007 NOAA SWEF Press Release
26 April 2007 NOAA SWW Presentation on Solar Radio Bursts (18.1 MB)
Movie depicting loss of GPS satellite observations due to solar radio burst on 6 Dec. 2006. Data taken from random sampling of IGS network receivers. The color of the dots represents the number of dual-frequency code observations made to each satellite. (15 MB)
QUOTE(flyingsquirrel @ Aug 29 2007, 05:36 PM) [snapback]120398[/snapback]
http://www.divulgence.net/Coverup.html
SOME QUOTES FROM THE SITE:
The actual shifts occurred on Dec 4 & 6, 2006. SOHO (NASA/ESA) & NOAA claim there was a historic solar flare on Dec 5 & 6, 2006. Supposedly the largest in recorded history. They also claimed that this flare knocked down the world GPS satellite system. Yet, they did not announce this to the public until after all global scientists met in April 2007.
There are no solar images for Dec 5 or 6, 2006. The dozens of solar images recorded daily and some twice hourly are all missing on the very dates they claim this historic flare occurred.
#1 If this had indeed been a solar flare of historic proportions, NASA, SOHO, NOAA, & NWS would have been bragging about the data. They certainly would not have removed the images of this event... and oddly enough, their webpage of historic solar flares does not list these dates either. Click here to see that page.
#2 Check out the menu of NASA's (SOHO) solar images. Those dates are missing from every solar
________________________________________________________________________________________
Have you noticed how the meteorologists on TV are now trying to focus on "The best weather in America?" Or how they seem to avoid mentioning the unusual weather? Did you know that none of the meteorologists on TV are allowed to declare a tornado warning or any other severe weather warning unless the National Weather Service issues the warning first? There was a meteorologist in Little Rock, Arkansas a few years ago who saw a tornado coming on the Doppler radar. The NWS refused to issue a Tornado warning. So he took it upon himself to contact the City officials to set off the tornado sirens and contacted the local airport to reroute planes. Although this local TV meteorologist saved a lot of people, the NWS was going to revoke his license for issuing a Tornado warning without their approval. So all of the weather experts are at the mercy of the National Weather Service. Without their licenses, they cannot continue in their jobs. A good reason as to why they are all so quiet.
(THIS I CAN VOUCH FOR MYSELF, RECENTLY, WE HAD A "POSSIBLE" TORNADO SIGHTED BY A WEATHER SPOTTER HERE IN COLUMBUS OH, BUT THE METEOROLGIST STATED THAT HE WAS NOT ALLOWED TO TALK ABOUT IT UNTIL THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE SAID HE COULD....)
Yes that is true national weather service. I used to have a boss that studied meteorology that also said this.
I am not sure about Dec. 4-6 missing from data so I checked Spaceweather. com said on December 4, 2006 the following:
"PROMINENCE ALERT: Grab your solar telescope. A large, flame-shaped prominence sprouted out of the sun's eastern limb during the weekend--and it's still there. Phil Jones of Frisco, Texas, took this picture using a Coronado MaxScope90."
Here is the pic---http://www.spaceweather.com/swpod2006/04dec06/jones.jpg
For December 5, 2006 Spaceweather has picture and data on the flare. They quote the following:
MAJOR FLARE: Earth-orbiting satellites detected a major X9-class solar flare this morning at 1035 UT (5:35 a.m. EST). The source: big, new sunspot 930*, which is emerging over the Sun's eastern limb. GOES-13 captured this X-ray image of the blast:Because of the sunspot's location near the limb, the flare was not Earth-directed. Future eruptions could be, however, because the Sun's spin is turning the spot toward Earth. Sunspot 930 will be visible for the next two weeks as it glides across the solar disk."
*Correction: Initially, we reported that the X9-class flare came from sunspot 929. The correct number is sunspot 930.
You can learn more about class here for solar flares. All X class flares are considered major flares, medium flares are considered M-class, small are C-class.
http://www.spaceweather.com/glossary/flareclasses.html
December 6, 2006 data:
"AURORA ALERT: Sky watchers, be alert for auroras. A solar wind stream hit Earth today, sparking a geomagnetic storm (in progress) at high latitudes. John Gray took this picture from the Isle of Lewis, Outer Hebrides, just a few hours ago. The huge green arch was very impressive," he says. "Even the nearly-full Moon did not stop the auroras from shining through."
Note: The solar wind stream that caused these auroras is unrelated to the solar explosions described below. Consider it a bonus.
ANGRY SUNSPOT: Solar activity is very high. New sunspot 930 has unleashed two X-class solar flares: an X9-flare on Dec. 5th and an X6- flare on Dec. 6th. Because of the sunspot's location near the eastern limb, the blasts were not squarely Earth-directed. Nevertheless, they might make themselves felt. Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) hurled into space by the explosions could deliver glancing blows to Earth's magnetic field as early as Dec. 7th, producing high-latitude geomagnetic storms.
Picture here: http://www.spaceweather.com/swpod2006/06dec06/nassr1.jpg
December 7, 2006
RADIATION STORM: A radiation storm is underway. Based on the energy and number of solar protons streaming past Earth, NOAA ranks the storm as category S3: satellites may experience single-event upsets and astronauts should practice "radiation avoidance."
The rush of protons may be a sign of an approaching CME (coronal mass ejection). Protons are accelerated in shock waves at the leading-edge of CMEs, so when the proton count rises, we can guess that a CME is en route. Northern sky watchers should remain alert for auroras, which could flare up if and when a CME arrives.
ANGRY SUNSPOT: Radio astronomer Thomas Ashcraft knew something was up yesterday when a loud roar came out of the loudspeaker of his 22 MHz shortwave receiver in New Mexico: Sunspot 930 had exploded again. The X6-class flare sent shock waves billowing through the sun's atmosphere, producing among other things a Type II solar radio burst: listen.
In Los Angeles, California, Gary Palmer watched the explosion through his Coronado SolarMax90: NOAA forecasters estimate a 50% chance of another X-flare during the next 24 hours. Further explosions could intensify the ongoing radiation storm and improve the chances for widespread auroras. Stay tuned.
BONUS: Even between explosions, a lot is happening around sunspot 930, as shown in this movie from French astronomer Pascal Paquereau. To create the animation, he combined "17 pictures taken every 2 minutes through my Coronado PST."
Picture here: http://www.spaceweather.com/swpod2006/07dec06/palmer1.jpg
December 8, 2006:
SOLAR TSUNAMI: When sunspot 930 exploded on Dec. 6th, producing an X6-category flare, it also created a tsunami-like shock wave that rolled across the face of the sun, wiping out filaments and other structures in its path. An H-alpha telescope in New Mexico operated by the National Solar Observatory (NSO) recorded the action:
"These large scale blast waves occur infrequently, however, are very powerful," says Dr. K. S. Balasubramaniam of the National Solar Observatory. "They quickly propagate in a matter of minutes covering the whole sun and apparently sweeping away filamentary material." Researchers are unsure whether the filaments were blown off or were compressed so they were temporarily invisible. Get the full story from the NSO.
AURORA WATCH: Sky watchers, be alert for auroras. A coronal mass ejection (CME) is expected to brush past Earth tonight, sparking a mild geomagnetic storm. The display will probably favor high latitudes--e.g., Scandinavia, Canada and Alaska--but it could descend as well to northern-tier US states such as Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin. The source of the CME is sunspot 930, which has been exploding regularly since it first appeared on Dec. 5th. The sunspot is slowly turning to face Earth. As it does, it might send more CMEs our way, and they would hit head-on rather than merely brushing past. By next week, Northern Lights could reach deep into the United States. Stay tuned. (And keep your fingers crossed.)
Here is NSO pictures and data:
http://www.nso.edu/press/tsunami/
Here again they refer to it on December 9, 2006:
SOLAR TSUNAMI: When sunspot 930 exploded on Dec. 6th, producing an X6-category flare, it also created a tsunami-like shock wave that rolled across the face of the sun, wiping out filaments and other structures in its path. An H-alpha telescope in New Mexico operated by the National Solar Observatory (NSO) recorded the action: These large scale blast waves occur infrequently, however, are very powerful," says Dr. K. S. Balasubramaniam of the National Solar Observatory. "They quickly propagate in a matter of minutes covering the whole sun and apparently sweeping away filamentary material." Researchers are unsure whether the filaments were blown off or were compressed so they were temporarily invisible. Get the full story from the NSO.
Please Note emphasis mine that that it was stated earlier on this same site classification was an X9, yet December 8th its an X6
Now if you read up here: http://www.spaceweather.com/glossary/flareclasses.html
You will see that X9 is the maximum classification.
You can go here www. spaceweather.com and type in the archive dates to see for yourself. The data is there but I noticed they called X9 for several days and later X6.
QUOTE (flyingsquirrel @ Aug 29 2007, 05:36 PM) 
http://www.divulgence.net/Coverup.html
SOME QUOTES FROM THE SITE:
The actual shifts occurred on Dec 4 & 6, 2006. SOHO (NASA/ESA) & NOAA claim there was a historic solar flare on Dec 5 & 6, 2006. Supposedly the largest in recorded history. They also claimed that this flare knocked down the world GPS satellite system. Yet, they did not announce this to the public until after all global scientists met in April 2007.
There are no solar images for Dec 5 or 6, 2006. The dozens of solar images recorded daily and some twice hourly are all missing on the very dates they claim this historic flare occurred.
#1 If this had indeed been a solar flare of historic proportions, NASA, SOHO, NOAA, & NWS would have been bragging about the data. They certainly would not have removed the images of this event... and oddly enough, their webpage of historic solar flares does not list these dates either. Click here to see that page.
#2 Check out the menu of NASA's (SOHO) solar images. Those dates are missing from every solar
________________________________________________________________________________________
Have you noticed how the meteorologists on TV are now trying to focus on "The best weather in America?" Or how they seem to avoid mentioning the unusual weather? Did you know that none of the meteorologists on TV are allowed to declare a tornado warning or any other severe weather warning unless the National Weather Service issues the warning first? There was a meteorologist in Little Rock, Arkansas a few years ago who saw a tornado coming on the Doppler radar. The NWS refused to issue a Tornado warning. So he took it upon himself to contact the City officials to set off the tornado sirens and contacted the local airport to reroute planes. Although this local TV meteorologist saved a lot of people, the NWS was going to revoke his license for issuing a Tornado warning without their approval. So all of the weather experts are at the mercy of the National Weather Service. Without their licenses, they cannot continue in their jobs. A good reason as to why they are all so quiet.
(THIS I CAN VOUCH FOR MYSELF, RECENTLY, WE HAD A "POSSIBLE" TORNADO SIGHTED BY A WEATHER SPOTTER HERE IN COLUMBUS OH, BUT THE METEOROLGIST STATED THAT HE WAS NOT ALLOWED TO TALK ABOUT IT UNTIL THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE SAID HE COULD....)
SOME QUOTES FROM THE SITE:
The actual shifts occurred on Dec 4 & 6, 2006. SOHO (NASA/ESA) & NOAA claim there was a historic solar flare on Dec 5 & 6, 2006. Supposedly the largest in recorded history. They also claimed that this flare knocked down the world GPS satellite system. Yet, they did not announce this to the public until after all global scientists met in April 2007.
There are no solar images for Dec 5 or 6, 2006. The dozens of solar images recorded daily and some twice hourly are all missing on the very dates they claim this historic flare occurred.
#1 If this had indeed been a solar flare of historic proportions, NASA, SOHO, NOAA, & NWS would have been bragging about the data. They certainly would not have removed the images of this event... and oddly enough, their webpage of historic solar flares does not list these dates either. Click here to see that page.
#2 Check out the menu of NASA's (SOHO) solar images. Those dates are missing from every solar
________________________________________________________________________________________
Have you noticed how the meteorologists on TV are now trying to focus on "The best weather in America?" Or how they seem to avoid mentioning the unusual weather? Did you know that none of the meteorologists on TV are allowed to declare a tornado warning or any other severe weather warning unless the National Weather Service issues the warning first? There was a meteorologist in Little Rock, Arkansas a few years ago who saw a tornado coming on the Doppler radar. The NWS refused to issue a Tornado warning. So he took it upon himself to contact the City officials to set off the tornado sirens and contacted the local airport to reroute planes. Although this local TV meteorologist saved a lot of people, the NWS was going to revoke his license for issuing a Tornado warning without their approval. So all of the weather experts are at the mercy of the National Weather Service. Without their licenses, they cannot continue in their jobs. A good reason as to why they are all so quiet.
(THIS I CAN VOUCH FOR MYSELF, RECENTLY, WE HAD A "POSSIBLE" TORNADO SIGHTED BY A WEATHER SPOTTER HERE IN COLUMBUS OH, BUT THE METEOROLGIST STATED THAT HE WAS NOT ALLOWED TO TALK ABOUT IT UNTIL THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE SAID HE COULD....)
Fascinating... I remember the events of those CMEs (Corona Mass Ejecta) being discussed in retrospect on a radio show back then. I'm sure there's plenty more that the governments of the world are not telling the people concerning threats to the Earth and civilization.
Got some really bad news here, being an ametiur astronomer, IF and a abig IF , that the Earth was tilted to 49.5 degrees, I would be able to see southern hemishpere stars and I still cannot see Shaula the Scorpion's sting, at my latitude at 51 degrees in the UK.
COMPLETE RUBBISH the Earth is still at 23.5 degrees on it's axis
COMPLETE RUBBISH the Earth is still at 23.5 degrees on it's axis
QUOTE (Mosesjoel @ Oct 13 2008, 04:02 AM)
Got some really bad news here, being an ametiur astronomer, IF and a abig IF , that the Earth was tilted to 49.5 degrees, I would be able to see southern hemishpere stars and I still cannot see Shaula the Scorpion's sting, at my latitude at 51 degrees in the UK.
COMPLETE RUBBISH the Earth is still at 23.5 degrees on it's axis
COMPLETE RUBBISH the Earth is still at 23.5 degrees on it's axis
Me too. And no, we don't have all the other amateurs buzzing about realigning their polar mounts.
Polaris is still the North Star.
Mike
Hi, Flyingsquirrel...
Here's more on this supposed poleshift. I don't really know how legitimate this is, though it goes against the conventional wisdom; if true, it certainly merits further investigated. But I would think just the inertia alone from oceanic water displacement would have been a catastrophic result, unless it was a slow and gradual process. And yet again the comments that Polaris is still the North Pole Star would certainly discount this hypothesis, that is... if Polaris is still truly the North Pole Star. Yet if this poleshift is true, it would certainly explain the melting north and south polar ice caps... wouldn't it?
SEE: http://divulgence.net/
BEFORE
AFTER
AFTER
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.