Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Chernobyl Accident Less Risky Than Passive Smoking?!
Christian-Forum.net > Current Events > Current Events
onetiggerroo
Living in Chernobyl Less Risky Than Passive Smoking — Study
Created: 03.04.2007 12:50 MSK (GMT +3), Updated: 12:54 MSK


MosNews


The risk of survivors of the Chernobyl accident dying early is far less than supposed, ranking about the same as exposure to air pollution or passive smoking, according to new research published on Tuesday.

The human toll from the world’s worst civil nuclear accident has been hotly debated ever since the Ukrainian power station’s No. 4 reactor blew up on April 26, 1986, spewing radioactive dust across Europe.
Now a top British scientist has evaluated the comparative risks and concluded that for those most affected by the disaster —- emergency workers and people living nearby —- the increased risk of premature death due to radiation is around 1 percent.

That is roughly the same as the risk of dying from diseases triggered by air pollution in a major city or the effects of inhaling other people’s tobacco smoke, said Jim Smith of Britain’s Centre for Ecology and Hydrology.

Smith has been a regular visitor to the contaminated 30-km (20-mile) “exclusion zone” around Chernobyl that straddles parts of Ukraine and neighbouring Belarus and has found wildlife to be thriving there.

Some people are also living in the area and surviving well into their 70s, he noted.

“Populations still living unofficially in the abandoned lands around Chernobyl may actually have a lower health risk from radiation than they would have if they were exposed to the air pollution health risk in a large city such as nearby Kiev,” Smith wrote in the journal BioMedCentral Public Health.

His study focused on long-term health risks to survivors who received high but non-lethal doses of radiation.

It excluded the cases of 134 firemen and helicopter pilots who suffered acute radiation sickness, leading to death in around 40 cases.

About 4,000 people also developed thyroid cancer in 1986 as a result of the accident, most of them children and adolescents, although the survival rate has been 99 percent.

Smith told reporters it was important to put the relative risks of radiation in perspective —- not least to help survivors of Chernobyl, who have suffered two decades of mental anguish about the risk of developing various cancers.

“The mis-perception of radiation risks has caused serious economic, social and psychological problems for the population,” he said.

The World Health Organisation puts at 9,000 the number of people expected to die of radiation exposure from Chernobyl, while environmental group Greenpeace has predicted an eventual death toll of 93,000.

Smith’s research was funded by Britain’s government-backed Natural Environment Research Council.

http://www.mosnews.com/feature/2007/04/03/chernobyl.shtml

wacko.gif
excubitor
QUOTE(onetiggerroo @ Apr 5 2007, 12:41 AM) [snapback]108086[/snapback]

Living in Chernobyl Less Risky Than Passive Smoking — Study
Created: 03.04.2007 12:50 MSK (GMT +3), Updated: 12:54 MSK


MosNews


The risk of survivors of the Chernobyl accident dying early is far less than supposed, ranking about the same as exposure to air pollution or passive smoking, according to new research published on Tuesday.

The human toll from the world’s worst civil nuclear accident has been hotly debated ever since the Ukrainian power station’s No. 4 reactor blew up on April 26, 1986, spewing radioactive dust across Europe.
Now a top British scientist has evaluated the comparative risks and concluded that for those most affected by the disaster —- emergency workers and people living nearby —- the increased risk of premature death due to radiation is around 1 percent.

That is roughly the same as the risk of dying from diseases triggered by air pollution in a major city or the effects of inhaling other people’s tobacco smoke, said Jim Smith of Britain’s Centre for Ecology and Hydrology.

Smith has been a regular visitor to the contaminated 30-km (20-mile) “exclusion zone” around Chernobyl that straddles parts of Ukraine and neighbouring Belarus and has found wildlife to be thriving there.

Some people are also living in the area and surviving well into their 70s, he noted.

“Populations still living unofficially in the abandoned lands around Chernobyl may actually have a lower health risk from radiation than they would have if they were exposed to the air pollution health risk in a large city such as nearby Kiev,” Smith wrote in the journal BioMedCentral Public Health.

His study focused on long-term health risks to survivors who received high but non-lethal doses of radiation.

It excluded the cases of 134 firemen and helicopter pilots who suffered acute radiation sickness, leading to death in around 40 cases.

About 4,000 people also developed thyroid cancer in 1986 as a result of the accident, most of them children and adolescents, although the survival rate has been 99 percent.

Smith told reporters it was important to put the relative risks of radiation in perspective —- not least to help survivors of Chernobyl, who have suffered two decades of mental anguish about the risk of developing various cancers.

“The mis-perception of radiation risks has caused serious economic, social and psychological problems for the population,” he said.

The World Health Organisation puts at 9,000 the number of people expected to die of radiation exposure from Chernobyl, while environmental group Greenpeace has predicted an eventual death toll of 93,000.

Smith’s research was funded by Britain’s government-backed Natural Environment Research Council.

http://www.mosnews.com/feature/2007/04/03/chernobyl.shtml

wacko.gif

The place has basically been taken over by wolves now. Plenty of things grow there and the wolves are certainly thriving. However there are some parts which are still dangerous. Mostly buildings which absorb radiation. There are organised tours into Chernobyl but most people freak out because of the deathly silence of the city.

You don't go there without geiger counters and if you stick to the roads you are basically OK. My view is that you survive the initial dose of radiation that healthy living will repair any damaged cells. Chernobyl would be quite safe to live in provided the high radiation areas were avoided.

Here is a great book on surviving a nuclear blast and radiation
http://standeyo.com/News_Files/NBC/nwss/s60p760.htm

Here are some articles listed
http://standeyo.com/News_Files/menu.nuke.html

Here is a fascinating article on a woman who rides her motorbike through Chernobyl. I think I found out about this woman on this forum. There are other sites claiming that this account is fraudulent but I believe her account and that the government wants to keep people out of the region.
http://www.kiddofspeed.com/chapter1.html

Various reports of life thriving in Chernobyl region with an interesting point that the best way to preserve wildlife is to stage a nuclear explosion and keep humans out.
http://adoraresponds.blogspot.com/2005/12/...s-it-grows.html

This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.